Hynexly

Market & Macro

One ETF Page, Four Percentages: What SEC Yield, Trailing Yield, YTM and Total Return Each Answer

On September 24, TLT showed a 5.41% SEC yield, a 4.90% trailing yield and a −6.15% year-to-date total return. What each number measures, why they differ, and the calculation that ties yield to rate risk.

Hynexly Research
8 min readMethodology
ETF yieldSEC yieldbond ETFsdurationtotal return
Number line for iShares TLT: year-to-date NAV total return −6.15%, 12-month trailing yield 4.90%, 30-day SEC yield 5.41% and average yield to maturity 5.55%, as of September 24–25, 2026.
Number line for iShares TLT: year-to-date NAV total return −6.15%, 12-month trailing yield 4.90%, 30-day SEC yield 5.41% and average yield to maturity 5.55%, as of September 24–25, 2026.

On September 24, the iShares page for TLT—a fund of U.S. Treasury bonds maturing in 20 years or more—showed a 30-day SEC yield of 5.41%. The same page showed a year-to-date total return of −6.15%.

Neither number is wrong; they answer different questions. An ETF yield is a portfolio's income under a stated rule, not a forecast of what you will earn. Before comparing two funds, check five labels—metric, window, denominator, cost treatment and date—then look at duration, because in a long-bond fund a small move in rates can outweigh months of income.

A yield is a rule, not a promise

TLT's three yields sit near one another because they describe income from the same bonds, each sliced differently: income accrued over 30 days, cash paid over 12 months, and the yield implied by today's bond prices. The return measures what holders actually experienced since January 1.

The 0.51-point gap between TLT's SEC and trailing yields comes mostly from how each rule counts income, not from anything that happened to the fund that day. If so, the gap should persist while TLT holds bonds priced well below face value.

Source Evidence Snapshot — what the SEC standardized

The SEC created a standardized yield so investors could compare similar funds more easily.

SEC staff description of the standardized SEC yield and the requirement to show total return alongside it
Source capture: SEC Division of Investment Management, ADI 2022-12, captured September 28, 2026. Footnote markers are the SEC's own.

Two sentences matter. The SEC yield approximates portfolio income over a historical 30-day period after expenses, annualized against the offering price. And a fund that advertises it must also show standardized total return with a past-performance legend, so the regulator itself treats yield and return as separate facts.

The formula's fine print explains why SEC yield often differs from cash paid out.

Form N-1A Item 26(b)(4): the SEC yield formula and the instruction to accrue bond interest at each bond's yield to maturity
Proof lane: SEC Form N-1A, Item 26(b)(4) and Instruction 1(a)–(b), PDF page 67 (printed page 57), read September 28, 2026. Exact wording reflowed for mobile reading, not an original-layout screenshot; “…” marks omitted words and the shading on Instruction 1(a) is added emphasis.

For bonds, the formula does not use the coupon. It accrues interest at each bond's yield to maturity on market value. A fund holding low-coupon bonds bought below face value can therefore show an SEC yield well above the cash it distributes.

Why TLT shows 5.41% and 4.90% on the same day

iShares TLT portfolio characteristics: 30-day SEC yield 5.41% and 12-month trailing yield 4.90% as of September 24; weighted average coupon 3.34, effective duration 14.84 years and average yield to maturity 5.55% as of September 25, 2026
Source capture: iShares TLT product page, Portfolio Characteristics card, captured September 28, 2026. Each field carries its own as-of date.
Metric (as of)What it countsDivided byTLTSGOV
30-day SEC yield (Sep. 24)
Interest accrued at each bond's yield to maturity, minus expenses, annualized
Maximum offering price per share
5.41%
3.67%
12-month trailing yield (Sep. 24)
Income distributions paid over the past year
Latest NAV plus the year's capital-gain distributions
4.90%
3.69%
Average yield to maturity (Sep. 25)
Yield implied by holdings' prices and cash flows; excludes fees
Holdings' market prices, including accrued interest
5.55%
3.99%
NAV total return, year to date (Sep. 24)
NAV change plus distributions since January 1
NAV at the start of the year
−6.15%
+2.64%

Definitions: SEC Form N-1A for the SEC yield; iShares field definitions for the other three. Values from the iShares TLT and SGOV pages.

Start with the two highest yields. Average yield to maturity, 5.55%, excludes fees; the SEC yield, 5.41%, deducts them. The 0.14-point gap is close to TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. Dates and methods differ slightly, so costs explain most of the gap, not all of it.

The wider gap is between SEC and trailing yield: 0.51 point. TLT's weighted average coupon was 3.34 while its bonds yielded 5.55% to maturity. A bond whose coupon is below its yield trades below face value, and part of its return comes from the price climbing toward face value by maturity. The SEC formula counts that climb as income.

The trailing measure records only what was distributed, over a look-back year when rates were different. iShares does not publish a split of the gap, so this is our reading of the mechanics, not a reported decomposition.

SGOV, which holds Treasury bills maturing within 3 months, shows a different effect: timing. Its SEC yield was 3.67% on September 24 and its average yield to maturity 3.99% a day later, a 0.32-point gap against a 0.09% expense ratio. Bill yields rose through the window: the Treasury's 1-month par yield went from 3.80% on August 26 to 4.01% on September 24, and the Fed raised its target range on September 16. A look-back measure trails a snapshot taken after the move.

The number every yield leaves out

Yield measures income; your result also depends on price. Duration estimates how far a bond fund's price moves when yields change. On September 25, TLT's effective duration was 14.84 years and SGOV's 0.10 year.

A 0.10-point rise in yields versus one month of SEC-yield income: SGOV +0.31% income against about −0.01% price change; TLT +0.45% income against about −1.48% price change
Source-derived explanation: iShares fields, our calculation. Price change ≈ −effective duration × 0.10; one month of income = SEC yield ÷ 12. First-order estimate that ignores convexity.

For TLT, a 0.10-point rise in yields would lower the price by about 1.48%, while one month of income at a 5.41% SEC yield is about 0.45%. That small move costs roughly 3.3 months of income. For SGOV, the same move costs about 0.01% against 0.31% of monthly income, so income dominates.

A rise of about 0.36 point in TLT's yields (5.41 ÷ 14.84) would offset a full year of its SEC-yield income. That is how a yield above 5% coexists with a −6.15% year-to-date return. For this year's move at the long end, see our analysis of why long Treasury yields diverge from the Fed rate.

Where this reading can fail

The duration math is a first-order approximation. It assumes an immediate, parallel move and ignores convexity; TLT reports 3.12, which cushions large rises and amplifies large falls. It also holds the SEC yield fixed, although the coming month brings new income.

Definitions differ: another sponsor may compute trailing yield on market price, over a different period or from the latest payment alone. For funds holding inflation-protected Treasuries, SEC staff warn that the short window can make yields swing month to month.

An ETF can also trade away from its net asset value, the per-share value of its holdings; the SEC's ETF bulletin explains these premiums and discounts. Taxes, credit risk outside Treasuries and your holding period change the outcome too. Our Circle reserve-income analysis shows the same rate-to-income translation inside a company's earnings.

Before you compare two yields

CheckTLT exampleIf it does not match
Same metric
SEC yield, 5.41%
Do not compare an SEC yield with a trailing or distribution yield
Same window
The month ended Sep. 24
Expect gaps after rate changes; SGOV's lag is one example
Same denominator
Maximum offering price per share
Check whether the other figure uses NAV or market price
Same cost treatment
After expenses
Yield to maturity excludes fees; subtract costs before comparing
Same date
Sep. 24
Refresh both numbers on one day
Duration added
14.84 years
Estimate the price change for a 0.10-point move before ranking by yield

The SGOV timing reading makes a dated prediction. By late October, the whole look-back window will postdate the September 16 hike. If SGOV's SEC yield has not moved closer to its yield to maturity by then, allowing for its 0.09% expense ratio, our reading is wrong or incomplete.

Method and sources

Figures come from the iShares TLT and SGOV pages, read on September 28, 2026, with each field's own as-of date. The SEC definition and formula come from ADI 2022-12 and Form N-1A Item 26(b)(4); bill yields from the Treasury's daily par yield curve; the September 16 decision from the Fed's statement. We calculated the gaps, monthly income (SEC yield ÷ 12), first-order price changes (−duration × 0.10) and the break-even move (SEC yield ÷ duration).

AI assisted with source organization, calculations, chart production and bilingual checks; figures and quotations were checked against the linked originals. This is general educational research, not individualized investment advice, a rating or a recommendation to buy or sell any fund.

Sources & evidence

Primary references cited or linked in this analysis. Click through to read each source in full.

  1. 01SEC staff ADI 2022-12 on SEC yield
  2. 02SEC Form N-1A, Item 26(b)(4)
  3. 03iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) product page
  4. 04iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) product page
  5. 05U.S. Treasury daily par yield curve, 2026
  6. 06Federal Reserve FOMC statement, September 16, 2026
  7. 07SEC investor bulletin: Exchange-Traded Funds

Continue the research

Choose the next evidence gap to investigate.

The Fed's 3.75–4.00% target range after September 16 beside September 22 Treasury yields of 4.96% at 10 years and 5.29% at 30 years.

Market & Macro7 min read

Why the Fed Rate Doesn't Tell the Whole Treasury Story

The Fed's September hike and the Treasury curve tell different stories. A matched nominal-versus-real yield comparison shows what changed—and what it cannot prove.

Read the next analysis
Share:
H
Hynexly Research

Owner-operated US market research desk

Owner-operated US stock and market coverage built from public filings, SEC EDGAR, official reports, company releases, and market data.

  • Source-grounded research with primary filings & official reports
  • Bilingual EN / KO editorial workflow
  • Manual editorial QA before publish

Your privacy choices

Choose whether Hynexly may use Google Analytics and personalized AdSense cookies. Necessary cookies always stay on. Change your choice anytime in our Privacy Policy.